Well, to start, it’s important to say that
the curriculum (and their subjects) of the Psychology study program here in
Universidad de Chile are a very good one; at least comparatively.
In other universities we can see a default
curriculum in which you only can choose your teacher and class, but not your
subjects at all. So, in this competitive model, students with better marks
choose their subjects first, which only increases the differences between
students by their marks. I think that this is a very poor system and misunderstood
of the purpose of the education.
So, in this university, we can choose what
subjects we want to learn and when we want. There are a very heterogenic field
of subjects to explore and discover, many of their waiting for people with good
ideas to make a contribution.
Despite of this, we can see that sometimes
some subjects has a lot of more workload than another subjects. I think that
this is a problem of the teachers that need to realize that they aren’t the
only subject in the university! Common people have at least 4-5 subjects by
semester, so, teachers please be more considered.
Also, we can see an important introduce of
the technology in the educative world. I think that this is great because as
psychologists we need to learn how to use the digital knowledge. I think that
as well you learnt this “by the force” during your study, program, at overall
we can say that the different subjects prepare you to understand most of the
digital databases and scientific research, which is a key skill that you need
to learnt if you want to survive as a social scientist.
I agree with you! also teachers thinks that the university is the only thing important in your life. I hate that
ResponderEliminar